Any organization engaged in international trade, financial transactions, or business relationships that cross borders — effectively every company with a global supply chain.
Sanctions programs (OFAC SDN List, EU Consolidated List, UK Sanctions List, UN Security Council lists, and dozens of national programs) prohibit transactions with designated individuals, entities, and jurisdictions. Compliance requires screening counterparties, suppliers, and supply chain participants against these lists — including beneficial owners, intermediaries, and associated entities — on an ongoing basis. The penalty for violations ranges from civil fines to criminal prosecution.
Screen across 1.8M+ tracked entities covering individuals, companies, organizations, securities, vessels, crypto wallets, and aircraft — with matching that handles aliases, transliterations, and name variations in any language.
Identify sanctioned entities hidden behind subsidiaries, shell companies, and intermediary ownership structures that simple name-matching tools miss.
Provide citation-backed evidence for every match so compliance teams can independently verify findings and document their screening process.
Continuously monitor for new designations and list updates — compliance is not a point-in-time exercise.
Defense prime contractors and their suppliers must go beyond named-entity list screening to trace ownership structures, identify restricted affiliates, and demonstrate continuous monitoring across sanctions, export controls, UFLPA, and foreign ownership frameworks.
Tier 2 and tier 3 suppliers manufacturing components for defense aerospace programs face an expanding documentation burden: material traceability, entity screening, and counterfeit avoidance are now prerequisites for subcontract awards.
Automotive manufacturers, EV makers, and their suppliers navigate simultaneous pressure from U.S. Section 301 tariffs, CBP UFLPA enforcement, and EU battery due diligence mandates, with FEOC ownership tracing required to access surviving clean energy incentives.
Battery manufacturers, pack assemblers, and the defense contractors that source batteries face overlapping NDAA named-entity prohibitions, FEOC-based restrictions, and UFLPA enforcement against lithium and battery inputs, with compliance deadlines beginning in August 2026.
Defense tech and dual-use startups face a compliance stack spanning ITAR, export classification, FOCI mitigation, CFIUS screening, and NDAA supply chain requirements — with investor and cap table screening often the highest-stakes obligation.
Drone manufacturers and parts suppliers face the most concentrated regulatory convergence in the defense industrial base, with ASDA, Blue UAS, Drone Dominance Program, and multiple NDAA deadlines all converging on January 1, 2027.
Miners, processors, and defense buyers in the critical minerals supply chain must document provenance from mine to finished product before the January 1, 2027 DFARS expansion — against a backdrop of China's export controls and rapidly growing UFLPA enforcement.
Prohibits importation of goods produced wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, placing the burden of proof on importers to demonstrate their supply chains are free of forced labor.
Controls the export and re-export of dual-use and defense-related items under EAR and ITAR, requiring end-user screening, item classification, and documentation to prevent controlled goods from reaching prohibited destinations.
Requires defense contractors and cleared companies to disclose and mitigate foreign ownership, control, or influence — including indirect relationships through board seats, financial ties, and technology agreements.